The Provocation: Royal Air Force Strikes Iranian Consulate
Truth Behind Iran’s Attack on Israel: On April 2, the Royal Air Force launched a missile attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus. It was such a difficult situation for Iran that a response to such an attack was necessary to maintain the red line. But the purpose of this attack was to drag Iran into the war. If Iran fell into this trap, it would have been justified to attack it and if it did not respond, its soil would have been destroyed.
Table of Contents
The Ticking Clock: Iran’s Response Time and the 48-Hour Rule
Now the important point to understand is that when a country strikes back in such a situation, it takes a maximum of 48 hours. For example, in February 2019, Pakistan retaliated against India within 24 hours, while recently it responded to the Iranian attack within 48 hours. In this type of situation, when the third day enters without a counterattack, it means that a major country has jumped in the middle and is trying to settle.
Negotiated Settlements: Behind-the-Scenes Diplomacy
Generally, the outcome of this attempt at settlement is that the affected country is asked to do well to target such and such a target of the attacking country, but to use missiles lightly. Thus, not only a small military target is fixed and important objects and people are removed from there, but the regular day and time of this counter-attack is also mutually fixed.
Political Machinations: Biden, Israel, and the Presidential Election
It is a presidential election year in the United States. Joe Biden’s nose is already close to being cut off in Ukraine. In such a situation, what Israel is trying to drag him into a war with Iran is dangerous for Biden. So we guess that the United States has “organized” today’s Iranian attack on Israel behind the scenes. There are a few reasons why we think so. The first reason is that Iran should not have taken more than 48 hours to launch a counterattack. He had to fire a missile in response. It did not require long thinking. Such military plans are already part of every country’s national security policy. The second reason is that it was Joe Biden who suddenly revealed three years ago that Iran was going to retaliate very soon. And the Israeli government had closed schools and colleges for two days from yesterday. The announcement of a holiday for one day before and one day after the night of the attack clearly indicates that the date and time were fixed. The third reason is that Iran used Shahid drones for the attack, the speed of which is a little less than a Corolla car, i.e. 140 km per hour. And they can easily be dropped from the Iron II system. According to its claim, Iran also has hypersonic missiles, which neither Israel nor the United States can defeat. Why didn’t he use one hypersonic missile instead of 200 drones which would have directly hit the target? The fourth reason is why Iran said this immediately after the attack
Suspicious Circumstances: Clues Pointing to Covert Operations
What was the need for Iran to say this? He should have said that he should have removed those who could remove him. The fifth and most important reason is that Iran is a red line for both Russia and China. So why are there no signs of tension in Beijing and Moscow? The foreign ministers should have been racing that a third world war could be triggered by Iran’s counter-attack. Keeping Beijing and Moscow calm is the biggest argument for match-fixing. But all this analysis of ours may prove to be wrong. And the only way to prove it wrong is to attack Iran. Let’s see if this Royal does it or not!
Conclusion
In conclusion, the events surrounding the Royal Air Force’s missile attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus are shrouded in intrigue and speculation. The timing of Iran’s response, the choice of weaponry, and the geopolitical implications all point to a complex web of covert operations and strategic maneuvering.
The 48-hour rule, observed in previous conflicts, underscores the significance of swift retaliation in such situations. However, Iran’s delayed response raises questions about external interference and behind-the-scenes negotiations aimed at de-escalation.
The involvement of key players like the United States, Israel, Russia, and China adds another layer of complexity to the situation. The implications for Joe Biden’s administration, especially amidst ongoing tensions in Ukraine, highlight the potential risks and consequences of being dragged into a wider conflict.
While theories of match-fixing and orchestrated attacks abound, conclusive evidence remains elusive. The absence of tension in Beijing and Moscow suggests a carefully orchestrated diplomatic dance aimed at preventing further escalation.
Ultimately, only time will reveal the truth behind these events. Until then, observers can only speculate and analyze the intricate geopolitical chessboard, hoping for a resolution that prioritizes peace and stability in the region. For more information, so please visit this link.